What it does

A working tool for the compliance seat.

Five verbs cover the job: ask the questions, analyze what arrives, draft what goes out, work through everything else, and watch the rules you rely on. Under all five sits the same guarantee — any regulatory claim is grounded in statute, regulation, and survey guidance, or it isn't made.

Ask

Regulatory questions, answered the way you need to rely on them — as written, cited, defensible.

A surveyor cites you under a condition of participation, or a facility asserts a requirement you don't recognize. Ask exactly that, in the words you'd use with a colleague — Jubal.med translates it into the regulatory terms of art, reads the sections that answer it, and returns the requirement as written.

The full authority stack on one card: statute, regulation, and survey guidance, each quoted verbatim
Effective and amendment dates on every cite, with links back to the official source
Survey guidance always badged as interpretive — never presented as binding law
A plain “not on file” when the controlling authority isn’t in the corpus — never a guessed cite

search → read → cite · every claim pinned

Analyze

The documents that land on your desk, taken apart claim by claim.

A deficiency statement arrives from a survey, or a payer denial cites chapter and verse against you. Hand the document to Jubal med: it identifies each regulatory claim inside, researches what the cited authority actually requires, and shows where each claim stands.

Every asserted requirement checked against the current text of the authority it cites
Claims the text doesn’t support, surfaced with the language that shows it
The start of your response: a cited basis for each point you intend to contest

deficiency · payer denial · facility letter

Draft

Research becomes work product you can send without rewriting.

The dispute needs a written response. Ask for a memo and Jubal med assembles the thread’s research into a structured document — question presented, short answer, the cited basis with verbatim quotes, and what remains open.

Cited memos exported as .docx, ready for a plan of correction, a facility, or the other side
Every citation in the memo traceable to text retrieved during the research
Corpus gaps stated in the memo body — what’s on file and what isn’t, in writing

memo.docx · pinned cites · honest gaps

Work

The rest of the job, in the same place as the research.

Not every task is a citation question. Draft the policy revision, outline the in-service, structure the response you've been putting off, think through how a requirement applies to the way your operation actually runs. Jubal med works the way a capable assistant would — and when a claim needs authority behind it, the same citation discipline applies without you switching tools.

General drafting and analysis — policies, checklists, correspondence, in-service outlines
Documents you upload stay attached to the thread, so follow-up questions keep their context
The moment an answer needs a regulatory basis, it comes back cited — no separate mode to remember
The same tier contract throughout: it will help you work, and still decline clinical judgment

policies · checklists · correspondence

Watch

The rules you rely on, watched so they don’t move without you.

Every answer records which sections your operation leaned on — the care planning condition for your setting, your state’s facility standards, the HIPAA provisions your policies cite. That citation trail becomes your watchlist.

A per-organization watchlist built automatically from your own research
Awareness when a watched section changes, so revisions start with you informed
A living map of the regulatory ground your operation actually stands on

42-418.56 · watched · point-in-time

Bring your hardest surveyor question.

Invite-only, with founding rates for early members. When someone tells you what the rules say, Jubal med shows you what the rules actually require.